Top pick · highest health
Chatwoot
Customer communication platform (alternative to Intercom and Zendesk).
Ticketing
Intercom bundles live chat, a shared inbox and bots in one hosted product; each tool here covers part of that on your own server. Chatwoot and Tiledesk are the closest match as customer communication platforms, Tiledesk with AI-powered chatbots, while FreeScout and Zammad are help desk and ticketing systems built around email and tickets.
Read the comparison: Chatwoot vs Zammad vs FreeScout: Help Desks for Small Teams
Showing 4 of 4 tools
Top pick · highest health
Customer communication platform (alternative to Intercom and Zendesk).
Email-based customer support application, help desk and shared mailbox (alternative to Zendesk and Help Scout).
All-in-one customer engagement platform from lead-gen to post-sales, from WhatsApp to your website. With omni-channel live agents and AI-powered chatbots (alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Tawk.to and Tidio).
Easy to use but powerful support and ticketing system.
We track 4 open-source Intercom alternatives, of which 3 currently score 70 or above on Repoly's GitHub health scale and 3 ship a Docker image. Chatwoot leads on health at 98/100 with 475 commits in the last 90 days; across all 4 projects you are choosing between AGPL-3.0, MIT, ⊘ Proprietary.
Chatwoot edges FreeScout 98 to 95, and most of the difference is stars: 39k stars against 4.6k stars.
The most recent release is Chatwoot v4.19.1, published 6 days ago. Zammad publishes no tagged releases, which costs up to 25 of the 100 points. None of the measured options scores under 40. By stack, Ruby (2) and PHP (1) are the most common. Tiledesk is permissively licensed; FreeScout and Zammad are copyleft. Chatwoot is source-available rather than open source, which limits commercial reuse.
4 of these 4 also appear among the Zendesk alternatives, which lists 2 more.
| Tool | Health | Stars | Last commit | Licence | Self-hosting | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatwoot Steady at 98 since 11 Sep | 98 | 39k | today | ⊘ Proprietary | Docker image | Long-term use: health 98/100 |
| FreeScout Steady at 95 since 11 Sep | 95 | 4.6k | today | AGPL-3.0 | Docker image | Fast development: 315 commits in 90 days |
| Tiledesk Up 32 points since 11 Sep | 70 | 325 | 2 days ago | MIT | Docker image | Fresh releases: 1.2.1, 24 days ago |
| Zammad Steady at 60 since 11 Sep, no tagged release | 60 | 6.1k | today | AGPL-3.0 | Manual (Ruby) | Community size: 6.1k stars |
Yes. 4 of the 4 Intercom alternatives we track are on GitHub, led by Chatwoot (github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot, health 98/100, 39k stars) and FreeScout (github.com/freescout-help-desk/freescout, health 95/100). Each tool page links its repository and shows the health score we recompute from it every night.
Chatwoot scores highest at 98/100, with 475 commits in the last 90 days, 39k stars on GitHub and its latest release (v4.19.1) published 6 days ago. Zammad has the most raw commit activity at 799 commits in 90 days.
3 of 4 publish a Docker image or Compose file: Chatwoot, FreeScout, Tiledesk. Docker support contributes 10 of the 100 available health points, because it is the clearest signal that self-hosting is a supported path rather than an afterthought.
On measured health Chatwoot leads, 98 to 95. Chatwoot has 475 commits in 90 days, 39k stars and v4.19.1 from 6 days ago; FreeScout has 315 commits in 90 days, 4.6k stars and 1.8.248 from 13 days ago. Chatwoot is ahead or level on every term Repoly measures.
1 of 4 are permissively licensed (MIT, Apache, BSD or similar): Tiledesk (MIT). 2 use copyleft licences such as GPL or AGPL, which require you to publish changes if you distribute a modified version.